Protect the outcome that matters
The first review focuses on real-user paths, data boundaries, operational visibility, incident recovery, and controlled technical debt. It separates launch-critical behavior from cleanup that can wait so the estimate reflects business impact, not a desire to rewrite everything.
Start with the user journey
Describe the first click, the expected result, the actual result, and whether the failure affects every user or a specific role, device, environment, or account state. That sequence becomes the acceptance test.
Preserve the work already completed
Useful copy, design, data, and working features should remain. Repair targets the failed boundary first; refactoring follows only when the existing structure cannot protect the result.
Choose done-for-you or live help
Provide scoped access for a direct repair, or work through the issue in a live screen-sharing session. Both use the same public hourly rate and written estimate process.
Know when to rebuild
A rebuild is justified when ownership, access, data safety, platform limits, or total repair cost makes continued patching irresponsible—not merely because the generated code looks untidy.